Your team can explain what makes a better reply.

The problem

You want to improve the prompt that answers emails. Your team can explain why one answer is useful and another is awkward, incomplete, or wrong.

You try a handful of emails, give feedback in a conversation, and rewrite the prompt. The next iteration starts without a dependable record of which examples improved and why.

How Nibuno would handle it

This was the original product idea: run a prompt on many example emails and let business users give feedback. The proposed workbench connects the input, answer, human explanation, revised prompt, and new results.

What you’d compare

Use the same examples to compare versions, identify new failures, and record what reviewers disagree about. A preferred tone cannot compensate for an inaccurate answer or an unauthorized promise.